Sexology & Health

Is it spiritually healthy to believe in Jesus Christ despite the trinity of lies and deceptions in it? Specifically, what will be your reaction if Jesus Christ is found not to be a real person in terms of authenticity of the name , authenticity of the image and validity of doctrines and   practices being attached to him by Christians? (Source of photo: Yaohú Servo Yaohushua’s facebook page). Or was his name merely invented by the bible , his image merely created by Leonardo Da Vinci and the doctrines and practices being attached to him merely created by false Christians by deceptively stealing the Words of God and mis-using the story of the real messiah? Related to the above issue is Habakkuk 2:12-14 , which is a prophecy for Vatican City , being the headquarter of the Roman Catholicism. As a background, Habakkuk 2 prophecy refers to the judgment for United States (Habakkuk 2:4-8), United Kingdom (Habakkuk 2:15-17) Vatican City and France (Habakkuk 2:9-11)

What is the significance of immorality verse (Genesis 9:4) being enclosed by procreation statements? To discuss the issue, let us first compare the scriptural passages for animal and human procreation, if there is difference in them. For animals: 15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals and birds went out of the boat in groups of their own kind. ( Genesis 8:15 , TEV) In God's Words " take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth ", is there any prohibition/condition pertaining to the act to procreate for animals and birds? None. For Human Beings:

Human genital is the central focus of sexual immorality. While other parts of the human body maybe used in " sodomy " or masturbation , still the mental focus on the sexually active individual is the genital of other person/s. In view however of the use of verb "eating" instead of "using" in the verse related to sexual immorality then obviously, it is referring  to the use of mouth as in " oral sex ".  Above proposition is logically proven by the following premises, with the subject verse stating as follows: 4The one thing you must not eat is meat with blood still in it; I forbid this because the life is in the blood.( Genesis 9:4 , TEV) First premise - the reason for prohibiting "eating meat with blood still in it" is because "life is in the blood" and not because "blood is life" or because of "blood" in meat. Second premise -if you take out "life" in blood, you consequently take out

The surrounding circumstances when immorality verse was spoken is very important in its interpretation. In brief, together with other verses, this was spoken to Noah and his sons after the flood. Although, the Book of Genesis does not specifically mention the traumatic effects of flood on the family of Noah, their fear may be seen and acknowledgement of the power of God was exhibited by Noah's acts of offering sacrifices to God. 13 When Noah was 601 years old, on the first day of the first month, the water was gone. Noah removed the covering of the boat, looked around, and saw that the ground was getting dry. 14 By the twenty-seventh day of the second month the earth was completely dry. 15 God said to Noah, 16 “Go out of the boat with your wife, your sons, and their wives. 17 Take all the birds and animals out with you, so that they may reproduce and spread over all the earth.” 18 So Noah went out of the boat with his wife, his sons, and their wives. 19 All the animals